McFarland v. State

254 S.W.3d 910, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 785, 2008 WL 2345899
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 2008·No. ED 90568·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, James McFarland, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law *911 appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFarland v. State, 254 S.W.3d 910, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 785, 2008 WL 2345899 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

254 S.W.3d 910 (McFarland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LORTON v. Hudgens
254 S.W.3d 910 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)