McFarland v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

McFarland v. State

56 N.E. 910, 154 Ind. 442, 1900 Ind. LEXIS 63

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 6, 1900

DocketNo. 19,238

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 56 N.E. 910 (McFarland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McFarland v. State, 56 N.E. 910, 154 Ind. 442, 1900 Ind. LEXIS 63 (Ind. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Baker, J.

Appellant was convicted of rape. The affidavit and information name Laura Yan Buskirk as .the [443]*443alleged victim. In the evidence, the only name proved was Lillie, — nothing more. The name was an essential element in the legal description of the offense. McLaughlin v. State, 52 Ind. 279; McLaughlin v. State, 52 Ind. 476; Black v. State, 57 Ind. 109; Mitchell v. State, 63 Ind. 276. for failure of proof, the judgment is reversed, with directions to sustain the motion for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker, J.

Appellant was convicted of rape. The affidavit and information name Laura Yan Buskirk as .the [443]*443alleged victim. In the evidence, the only name proved was Lillie, — nothing more. The name was an essential element in the legal description of the offense. McLaughlin v. State, 52 Ind. 279; McLaughlin v. State, 52 Ind. 476; Black v. State, 57 Ind. 109; Mitchell v. State, 63 Ind. 276. for failure of proof, the judgment is reversed, with directions to sustain the motion for a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.E. 910, 154 Ind. 442, 1900 Ind. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarland-v-state-ind-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack