McFarland v. State
794 So. 2d 763, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13414, 2001 WL 1132117
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 2001·No. No. 1D01-341·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the denial of the defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion in all respects, except that the sentence imposed in case number 98-764 must be corrected to show that the crime of attempted second degree murder is a second degree felony, and that the fifteen-year sentence for that crime is to run concurrent with the other sentences imposed by the court. The defendant need not be present for this correction.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McFarland v. State, 794 So. 2d 763, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13414, 2001 WL 1132117 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
794 So. 2d 763 (McFarland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
93 So. 3d 387 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)