McFarland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

57 N.E. 1116, 162 N.Y. 655, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1417
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 57 N.E. 1116 (McFarland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McFarland v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 57 N.E. 1116, 162 N.Y. 655, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1417 (N.Y. 1900).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ. Dissenting: Werner, J. Not voting: Parker, Ch. J. . Not sitting: Gray, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 N.E. 1116, 162 N.Y. 655, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarland-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-ny-1900.