McFarland v. Fricks

Supreme Court of Georgia

McFarland v. Fricks

24 S.E. 868, 99 Ga. 104

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 19, 1896

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 868 (McFarland v. Fricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McFarland v. Fricks, 24 S.E. 868, 99 Ga. 104 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Where a transcript of the record of a decree purporting to have been rendered by a court of record of another State has been duly certified under the act of Congress, embodied in section 3830 of the Code, this is sufficient evidence of the validity of such decree, although it does not appear to have been signed by the chancellor. Nor, in such case, is it at all essential to show that he signed the minutes of the court by which such decree was rendered. Judgment affirmed.

17. II. Payne and Copeland & J achson, for plaintiff in error. R. M. W. Grlenn, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, J.

Where a transcript of the record of a decree purporting to have been rendered by a court of record of another State has been duly certified under the act of Congress, embodied in section 3830 of the Code, this is sufficient evidence of the validity of such decree, although it does not appear to have been signed by the chancellor. Nor, in such case, is it at all essential to show that he signed the minutes of the court by which such decree was rendered. Judgment affirmed.

17. II. Payne and Copeland & J achson, for plaintiff in error. R. M. W. Grlenn, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E. 868, 99 Ga. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarland-v-fricks-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack