McFarland v. Farmers Production Credit Association
This text of 38 B.R. 374 (McFarland v. Farmers Production Credit Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter is before the court on defendant Farmers Production Credit Association’s resisted motion for reversal of bankruptcy court’s decision, filed January 3, 1984. Denied.
On October 31, 1983 the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Iowa issued “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and ORDERS Sustaining Complaint to Avoid Lien, with Memorandum” herein. Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8001, on November 4, 1983 defendant filed a notice of appeal from the bankruptcy court’s decision. Defendant bases its appeal on the same grounds urged below. Specifically, defendant contends:
1) Section 522(f)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code does not apply retroactively to exempt liens established in the “gap” between the enactment and the effective date of the 1978 Bankruptcy Reform Act;
2) Retroactive application of § 522(f)(2) violates its fifth amendment due process rights; and
3) Its lien on the farm equipment is pos-sessory; hence, it may not be avoided under § 522(f)(2). Plaintiff has resisted defendant’s motion and seeks affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s decision.
The bankruptcy court’s factual findings should be affirmed unless clearly erroneous; however, its conclusions of law are freely reviewable on appeal. See Matter of Multiponics, Inc., 622 F.2d 709, 713 (5th Cir.1980); Matter of Perimeter Park Investment Associates, Ltd., 616 F.2d 150, 151 (5th Cir.1980); Solomon v. Northwestern State Bank, 327 F.2d 720, 724 (8th Cir.1964).
Here, the court has independently reviewed the record and applied the law thereto. Contrary to defendant, the court finds the bankruptcy court’s decision to be. particularly well reasoned. Accordingly, the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and memorandum are adopted in their entirety. See Bankruptcy Rule 8013.
It is therefore
ORDERED
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 B.R. 374, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarland-v-farmers-production-credit-association-iand-1984.