McFarland v. Carver
This text of 34 Mo. 195 (McFarland v. Carver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
There is no ground for reversing this case. The instructions given required the jury to find for the defendant if the plaintiff misrepresented to the defendant, or concealed from him, the true condition of the land sold ; or used any artifice to mislead the defendant as to its condition. This put the case as favorably for the defendant as the law required, and the other instructions did not weaken the effect of those first mentioned. Without repeating them all, it is sufficient to say, that, taken together, they presented the case to the jury very fairly.
The motion for a continuance is not considered, because it is not made a part of the record by the bill of exceptions. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Mo. 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfarland-v-carver-mo-1863.