McFarland v. Carver

34 Mo. 195
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no ground for reversing this case. The instructions given required the jury to find for the defendant if the plaintiff misrepresented to the defendant, or concealed from him, the true condition of the land sold ; or used any artifice to mislead the defendant as to its condition. This put the case as favorably for the defendant as the law required, and the other instructions did not weaken the effect of those first mentioned. Without repeating them all, it is sufficient to say, that, taken together, they presented the case to the jury very fairly.

The motion for a continuance is not considered, because it is not made a part of the record by the bill of exceptions. Judgment affirmed.

Judge Bay concurs. Judge Dryden did not sit, having been of counsel in the lower court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFarland v. Carver, 34 Mo. 195 (Mo. 1863).

34 Mo. 195 (McFarland v. Carver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Hendrix
312 S.W.2d 163 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1958)
McCaw v. O'Malley
249 S.W. 41 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1923)
Judd v. Walker
114 S.W. 979 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)
Judd v. Walker
89 S.W. 558 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Key v. Jennings
66 Mo. 356 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1877)
Wannell v. Kem
57 Mo. 478 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1874)
Langdon v. Green
49 Mo. 363 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1872)