McFarland v. Brown
22 F. 787, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2603
Opinion
This ease was argued and submitted upon the same proof as the case of this Same Complainant v. Deere & Mansar Manuf’g Co., ante, 783, and the reasons which led me to the conclusion that Hiero was no infringement in the first case are equally applicable to tins case. The bill is therefore dismissed for want of equity.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McFarland v. Brown, 22 F. 787, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2603 (uscirct 1884).
22 F. 787 (McFarland v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.