McFalls v. Western Carolina Center

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJune 8, 2010
DocketI.C. NO. 207933.
StatusPublished

This text of McFalls v. Western Carolina Center (McFalls v. Western Carolina Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McFalls v. Western Carolina Center, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2010).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn, and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. Having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission reverses the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Glenn.

*********** *Page 2
The Full Commission finds as facts and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties before Deputy Commissioner Glenn as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and the Industrial Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of this case. All the parties are bound by and subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. All parties have been correctly designated and there is no question as to the misjoinder or nonjoinder of any party.

2. An employment relationship existed between the plaintiff-employee and the defendant-employer at all relevant times herein.

3. Defendant-employer was an approved self-insured with Key Risk Management Services acting as its third party administrator at all relevant times herein.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $451.23 per week, yielding a compensation rate of $300.84 per week.

5. Plaintiff sustained an admittedly compensable injury by accident while in the course and scope of employment with defendant-employer on January 25, 2002 when she tripped and fell fracturing her right hip. Defendant filed a Form 60 on or about February 19, 2002 admitting decedent's right to recover worker's compensation benefits as a result of her fall.

6. Plaintiff was admitted to Frye Regional Medical Center for back surgery on February 23, 2005 and she died on February 26, 2005.

7. The following exhibits were admitted into evidence at the hearing:

a. stipulation #1, plaintiff's medical records;

b. stipulation #2, Mr. McFalls' medical records;

*Page 3

c. stipulation #3, plaintiff's medical records, forms and discovery;

d. plaintiff's exhibit #1, Form 21 dated November 4, 2005;

e. plaintiff's exhibit #2, Form 21 dated September 2004;

f. plaintiff's exhibit #3, Letter from Angela Barber to Tammy Leggins dated September 27, 2004;

g. plaintiff's exhibit #4, Form 60;

h. plaintiff's exhibit #5, Form 19; and,

i. plaintiff's exhibit #6, Letter from Angela Barber to Tammy Leggins dated September 23, 2004.

8. The issues to be determined from this hearing are as follows:

a. Whether decedent's death was caused by her admittedly compensable injury by accident?

b. If so, to what, if any, workers' compensation benefits is decedent's estate entitled to recover under the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act?

c. Whether decedent's estate is entitled to recover the payment of the permanent partial disability rating decedent had been given as a result of the admittedly compensable injury by accident?

d. If so, whether defendants would be entitled to a credit or off-set for benefits heretofore paid to decedent?

***********
The Pre-Trial Agreement along with its attachments and any additional stipulations are hereby incorporated by reference as though they were fully set out herein.

*********** *Page 4
Based upon all of the competent credible evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACTS
1. Decedent was born on April 26, 1942. In approximately 1988, decedent began working for defendant-employer as a developmental technician.

2. Decedent had a history of back pain beginning in approximately December 1996 for which she saw Dr. Plyler, her family physician.

3. Decedent continued to work despite her back problems but saw Dr. Plyler again in February, 2000, complaining of severe back pain. Decedent's MRI findings on February 23, 2000 showed lumbar spondylosis with a broad-based disc bulge at L4-5 and severe central canal bilateral foraminal stenosis. Dr. Plyler's notes from that date indicate that decedent was walking with a limp and favoring her left leg.

4. Throughout 2000 and 2001, decedent continued to have chronic back pain but continued to work. Her medical providers attempted conservative pain treatments with limited relief but ultimately, her back pain did not improve, and she consulted in August 2001 with Dr. David Jones, M.D., of Piedmont Neurosurgery. After reviewing decedent's radiology reports in September 2001, Dr. Jones recommended back surgery. On October 7, 2001, Dr. Jones performed a bilateral L4-5 decompression and left sided discectomy.

5. Decedent had post-operative visits with Dr. Jones on October 17, November 6, and December 12, 2001. Dr. Jones' reports indicate that decedent was doing well, although she continued to have occasional discomfort around her left SI joint.

6. On January 7, 2002, decedent returned to full duty work with defendant-employer for approximately three weeks. *Page 5

7. On January 25, 2002, while at work for defendant-employer, decedent lost her balance and fell on a tile over concrete floor, resulting in a right intertrochanteric hip fracture. Immediately after her fall, decedent was transported by emergency medical services (EMS) to Grace Hospital in Morganton, North Carolina. The EMS records indicate that decedent's chief complaint was pain in her right hip and that she denied any secondary complaints.

8. Following an examination by a doctor in Grace Hospital's emergency room, Dr. Myron Smith performed an open reduction internal fixation on decedent's right hip.

9. Dr. Smith saw decedent post-operatively and there is no indication that decedent complained of back pain. Dr. Smith testified that generally, if he is consulted for a hip fracture or a fall, he always asks the patient on the first and second days that he sees them, and oftentimes again, if that is the only place that hurts.

10. Following decedent's surgery, Dr. Smith continued to see and treat decedent. At every examination Dr. Smith asked decedent whether she was having any pain, and he would have indicated any reported pain in his notes. Dr. Smith's records contain no indication that decedent was experiencing back pain.

11. Dr. Smith opined that decedent's hip surgery went well, although she did have a persistent antalgic gait or limp which was not severe. On August 12, 2002, Dr. Smith found decedent to be at MMI and released her with a 15% permanent impairment rating.

12. Dr. Smith treated decedent again from September 6, 2002 through December 13, 2002 for a stress fracture to her right foot which was unrelated to her workers' compensation injury. At that time, Dr. Smith placed decedent in a short-leg cast which would have changed decedent's gait. There is no indication in Dr. Smith's notes relating to the treatment of decedent's stress fracture to her right foot that decedent was experiencing back pain. *Page 6

13. Decedent's last medical compensation for her January 25, 2002 work injury was paid on January 22, 2003.

14.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.
265 S.E.2d 389 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1980)
Whitley v. Columbia Lumber Mfg. Co.
348 S.E.2d 336 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
Young v. Hickory Business Furniture
538 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2000)
Moretz v. Richards & Associates, Inc.
342 S.E.2d 844 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
Gilmore v. . Board of Education
23 S.E.2d 292 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Gilmore v. Hoke County Board of Education
222 N.C. 358 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McFalls v. Western Carolina Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfalls-v-western-carolina-center-ncworkcompcom-2010.