McFall v. Wilson

6 Blackf. 260
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1842·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

TO a plea of failure of consideration, m a suit on a promissory note, a general replication that the consideration had not failed as alleged, is sufficient. Farmer v. Fairman, 5 Blackf., 257.

If the assignment of a patent right be not recorded in the office of the Secretary of State of the United States, a note given to the assignee for such right is invalid for the want of consideration. Higgins v. Strong et al., 4 Blackf., 182.

If a declaration on a promissory, note contain the common counts, and there be judgment by default- for the plaintiff^ there must be a writ of inquiry, unless the parties submit, the case to the Court, or a nolle prosequi be entered as to the common counts. , Wood v. Lemon, 1 Blackf., 198, note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFall v. Wilson, 6 Blackf. 260 (Ind. 1842).

6 Blackf. 260 (McFall v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Starbuck v. Lazenby
7 Blackf. 268 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1844)