McFall v. Wilson

6 Blackf. 260
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1842
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Blackf. 260 (McFall v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McFall v. Wilson, 6 Blackf. 260 (Ind. 1842).

Opinion

TO a plea of failure of consideration, m a suit on a promissory note, a general replication that the consideration had not failed as alleged, is sufficient. Farmer v. Fairman, 5 Blackf., 257.

If the assignment of a patent right be not recorded in the office of the Secretary of State of the United States, a note given to the assignee for such right is invalid for the want of consideration. Higgins v. Strong et al., 4 Blackf., 182.

If a declaration on a promissory, note contain the common counts, and there be judgment by default- for the plaintiff^ there must be a writ of inquiry, unless the parties submit, the case to the Court, or a nolle prosequi be entered as to the common counts. , Wood v. Lemon, 1 Blackf., 198, note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Starbuck v. Lazenby
7 Blackf. 268 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Blackf. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfall-v-wilson-ind-1842.