McFall v. Roderick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

McFall v. Roderick

697 P.2d 569, 72 Or. App. 776, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2851

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 20, 1985

Docket16-80-04806; CA A32604

StatusPublished

This text of 697 P.2d 569 (McFall v. Roderick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McFall v. Roderick, 697 P.2d 569, 72 Or. App. 776, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2851 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs brought this action for trespass and to quiet title to certain real property against three defendants, Chad and Roma Roderick and Diane Erdman. Plaintiffs appeal from a default judgment entered in favor of the Rodericks. The judgment does not adjudicate the rights and liabilities of defendant Erdman, and neither the order of default, the order granting the Rodericks’ “Motion For Entry of Judgment After Default” nor the judgment itself contain an express determination that there is no just reason for delay or an express direction for the entry of judgment as required by ORCP 67B. The judgment is not appealable. Hale v. County of Multnomah, 298 Or 141, 689 P2d 1290 (1984); May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, 297 Or 525, 686 P2d 1015 (1984).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs brought this action for trespass and to quiet title to certain real property against three defendants, Chad and Roma Roderick and Diane Erdman. Plaintiffs appeal from a default judgment entered in favor of the Rodericks. The judgment does not adjudicate the rights and liabilities of defendant Erdman, and neither the order of default, the order granting the Rodericks’ “Motion For Entry of Judgment After Default” nor the judgment itself contain an express determination that there is no just reason for delay or an express direction for the entry of judgment as required by ORCP 67B. The judgment is not appealable. Hale v. County of Multnomah, 298 Or 141, 689 P2d 1290 (1984); May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, 297 Or 525, 686 P2d 1015 (1984).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 P.2d 569, 72 Or. App. 776, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfall-v-roderick-orctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack