McFaddin v. Sparks

229 A.D. 704

This text of 229 A.D. 704 (McFaddin v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McFaddin v. Sparks, 229 A.D. 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ., Sherman, J., dissents and votes for reversal on the ground that the writings would be sufficient under the Statute of Frauds, if signed by the parties, and that the remaining issue of agency should be determined in the manner provided by rule 108 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or upon trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfaddin-v-sparks-nyappdiv-1930.