Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McFadden v. State

McFadden v. State

256 So. 3d 223
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 28, 2018·No. Case No. 5D17-2221·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Asencio v. State , 244 So.3d 294, 297 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (explaining that an audio recording may be authenticated by a records custodian of jail calls, even if that custodian is not personally familiar with the defendant's voice because the question for the trial court is not whether the evidence is authentic, but whether evidence exists from which the jury could reasonably conclude that it is authentic).

COHEN, C.J., BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFadden v. State, 256 So. 3d 223 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

256 So. 3d 223 (McFadden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAIDE WISTON ASENCIO, JR. v. STATE OF FLORIDA
244 So. 3d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)