McFadden v. Jones
1 Cal. 453
This text of 1 Cal. 453 (McFadden v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McFadden v. Jones, 1 Cal. 453 (Cal. 1851).
Opinion
By the Court,
I have no doubt of the illegality and injustice of the judgment appealed from. But the case is not distinguishable from the case of Folsom v. Root, decided at the last term by a majority of the members of the court, myself dissenting. I suppose, therefore, that the judgment must be affirmed on the principle of stare decisis.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cal. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcfadden-v-jones-cal-1851.