McFadden v. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2006·No. 05-7952·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7952

BERNARD MCFADDEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DESIREE R. ALLEN, Court Services Manager; MARGARET T. SULLIVAN, Official Court Reporter for Sumter County Court of General Sessions in their individual or personal and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA-05-887-3-RBH)

Submitted: July 21, 2006 Decided: August 4, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court on the basis

that this action is precluded by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477

(1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McFadden v. Allen, (4th Cir. 2006).

McFadden v. Allen (McFadden v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)