McEwen v. Timmerman-Cooper

877 N.E.2d 987, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1434
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 2007
Docket2007-1833
StatusPublished

This text of 877 N.E.2d 987 (McEwen v. Timmerman-Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McEwen v. Timmerman-Cooper, 877 N.E.2d 987, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1434 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

In Prohibition. On respondents’ answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
877 N.E.2d 987, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcewen-v-timmerman-cooper-ohio-2007.