McEwen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McEwen v. State

1925 OK CR 172, 234 P. 1117, 30 Okla. Crim. 164, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 181

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 2, 1925

DocketNo. A-4841.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 172 (McEwen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McEwen v. State, 1925 OK CR 172, 234 P. 1117, 30 Okla. Crim. 164, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 181 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

J. W. McEwen, plaintiff in error, was by verdict of a jury found guilty of a second offense of illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor, with his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 6 months. No briefs havei been filed by either party. An examination of the record disclosed that the information is sufficient, that the evidence anaply supports the accusation and the verdict, that the instructions of the court fairly stated the law of the case, and that the plaintiff in error otherwise had a fair trial. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

J. W. McEwen, plaintiff in error, was by verdict of a jury found guilty of a second offense of illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor, with his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 6 months. No briefs havei been filed by either party. An examination of the record disclosed that the information is sufficient, that the evidence anaply supports the accusation and the verdict, that the instructions of the court fairly stated the law of the case, and that the plaintiff in error otherwise had a fair trial. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 172, 234 P. 1117, 30 Okla. Crim. 164, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcewen-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.