McEwen v. Donnie R. O.

192 A.D.2d 708, 598 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4269
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1993·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In a proceeding to establish paternity pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Bernhard, J.), dated January 10, 1991, which overruled the petitioner’s objections to an order of the same court (Winslow, H.E.), dated October 30, 1990, dismissing the petition without prejudice.

Ordered that the order dated January 10, 1991, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the instant paternity proceeding had already been adjourned as a consequence of the mother’s nonappearance, the Hearing Examiner did not improvidently exercise her discretion in dismissing the petition without prejudice to a subsequent refiling, when the mother again failed to appear for a hearing at which the contested issue of paternity was to be considered. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McEwen v. Donnie R. O., 192 A.D.2d 708, 598 N.Y.S.2d 732, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 708 (McEwen v. Donnie R. O.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Williams v. Panzarino
2024 NY Slip Op 02060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Jeffrey H. v. Crystal E.
103 A.D.3d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Habib v. Habib
277 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Westchester County Department of Social Services v. Travis W.
216 A.D.2d 307 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)