McEntyre v. State
125 S.E. 766, 33 Ga. App. 54, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 716
This text of 125 S.E. 766 (McEntyre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McEntyre v. State, 125 S.E. 766, 33 Ga. App. 54, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
Opinion
The ionvietion was dependent wholly upon circumstantial evidence, and the evidence was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. It was therefore error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 766, 33 Ga. App. 54, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcentyre-v-state-gactapp-1924.