McElwain v. Huston

25 P. 465, 1 Wash. 359, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 73
Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 13, 1890·No. No. 102·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court ivas delivered by

Stiles, J.

An order of the superior court striking out a portion of the defendant’s answer is not an appealable order, therefore, the appeal must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Hoyt, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur. Anders, C. J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McElwain v. Huston, 25 P. 465, 1 Wash. 359, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 73 (Wash. 1890).

25 P. 465 (McElwain v. Huston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pelly v. Behneman
12 P.2d 422 (Washington Supreme Court, 1932)
Vaktaren Publishing Co. v. Pacific Tribune Publishing Co.
83 P. 426 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Old National Bank v. O. K. Gold Mining Co.
19 Wash. 194 (Washington Supreme Court, 1898)
Olsen v. Newton
30 P. 450 (Washington Supreme Court, 1891)