McElveen v. Handshaw

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McElveen v. Handshaw

102 S.E. 382, 25 Ga. App. 15, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 555

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 3, 1920

Docket10970

StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 382 (McElveen v. Handshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McElveen v. Handshaw, 102 S.E. 382, 25 Ga. App. 15, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 555 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease — a trover suit — demanded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff as to title, and it was not error for the court so to instruct the jury. The only remaining issue was as to the proved value of the property sued for. The charge of the court upon this question was appropriate and full. The evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, and, the judge of the superior court having approved that finding, it was proper to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence in this ease — a trover suit — demanded a verdict in favor of the plaintiff as to title, and it was not error for the court so to instruct the jury. The only remaining issue was as to the proved value of the property sued for. The charge of the court upon this question was appropriate and full. The evidence authorized the verdict for the plaintiff, and, the judge of the superior court having approved that finding, it was proper to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 S.E. 382, 25 Ga. App. 15, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelveen-v-handshaw-gactapp-1920.