McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc.

471 F. App'x 127
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 9, 2012
DocketNo. 11-2055
StatusPublished

This text of 471 F. App'x 127 (McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc., 471 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerold M. McElvaine seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon [128]*128substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElvaine v. Tradesman Int’l Inc., Nos. 10-0486; 10-0486A (B.R.B. Apr. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 901-950
33 U.S.C. § 901-950
§ 901
33 U.S.C. § 901

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 F. App'x 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelvaine-v-tradesman-international-inc-ca4-2012.