McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc.

471 F. App'x 127
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2012·No. No. 11-2055·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerold M. McElvaine seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of longshore disability benefits pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2006). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon [128] substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElvaine v. Tradesman Int’l Inc., Nos. 10-0486; 10-0486A (B.R.B. Apr. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc., 471 F. App'x 127 (4th Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 127 (McElvaine v. Tradesman International Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-950
33 U.S.C. § 901-950
§ 901
33 U.S.C. § 901