McElroy v. Gates

124 P. 1127, 69 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 981
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McElroy v. Gates. Read the opinion of the Court — 64 Wash. 249
Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 29, 1912·No. No. 9573·Published

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Pee Cubiam.

Upon a rehearing of this case en lane, a majority

of the court have concluded that the residence of the defendant at the time the contract was entered into continues to be his residence for the purposes of the contract, and the fact that he was out of the state when the notes became due and remained out did not change his residence so as to set the statute of Missouri in operation. The right of the plaintiff to bring the action in Missouri was therefore unaffected by the defendant’s absence or residence elsewhere thereafter. We are satisfied that the correct result was reached in the department decision heretofore rendered. McElroy v. Gates, 64 Wash. 249, 116 Pac. 845.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McElroy v. Gates, 124 P. 1127, 69 Wash. 699, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 981 (Wash. 1912).

124 P. 1127 (McElroy v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McElroy v. Gates
116 P. 845 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)