McElroy v. City of Reno

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 17, 2024
Docket3:23-cv-00451
StatusUnknown

This text of McElroy v. City of Reno (McElroy v. City of Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McElroy v. City of Reno, (D. Nev. 2024).

Opinion

1 JACK D. CAMPBELL Attorney at Law 2 Nevada State Bar #4938 418 River Flow Ct. 3 Reno, NV 89523 4 (775) 219-6699 Attorney for Plaintiffs Apryl McElroy and 5 Jessica Troup 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 APRYL MCELROY AND JESSICA CASE NO.: 3:23-cv-00451-ART-CSD 9 TROUP, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 vs. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 RENO POLICE SERGEANT PAUL D. 13 SIFRE (RET.), an individual and in his capacity as an employee of CITY OF RENO, 14 RENO CHIEF OF POLICE JASON D. SOTO (RET.), an individual and in his 15 capacity as an employee of the CITY OF 16 RENO, CITY OF RENO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the 17 laws of the state of Nevada, and its division 18 the CITY OF RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT, a Nevada law enforcement 19 agency, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, 20 21 Defendants. / 22 Plaintiffs Apryl MCELROY and Jessica TROUP, by and through their undersigned 23 counsel, Jack D. Campbell, Esq.; Defendants, CITY OF RENO, RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 24 and JASON SOTO, by and through their undersigned counsel, Karl S. Hall, Reno City attorney 25 and Holly S. Parker, Deputy City Attorney; and Defendant PAUL D. SIFRE, by and through his 26 undersigned counsel, Ronald J. Dreher, Esq. (collectively “the Parties”), hereby agree and stipulate 27 to the entry of a Protective Order as follows: 28 Jack D Campbell 1 I. Reason for the Order: The Parties have requested or may request production of documentation that the Parties contend includes confidential information or highly personal private 2 information, including but not limited to Internal Affairs files, photographs, employment records, 3 personnel records, medical records, compelled statements, and possibly other documentation that 4 the Parties would object to production of as confidential and private documentation, or for which 5 they may seek a protective order, if the documentation described herein were not protected by this 6 Stipulated Protective Order. The purpose of this Stipulated Protective Order is to facilitate the 7 Parties in the discovery process. However, the mere existence of this Protective Order does not 8 waive Defendants’ right to object to production and redact certain documentation or information. 9 If any such objection is made and the parties are unable to agree, the production or protection of 10 the documentation or information shall be submitted to the Court for review and decision 11 concerning production or protection. 12 II. Confidential Documentation and Information: 13 A. The Parties may subject any documentation they have previously produced 14 or produce hereafter, or that any non-party produces in response to a subpoena or otherwise, to the 15 protections of this Stipulated Protective Order by: 16 1. Marking any document or response to discovery which that party 17 considers in good faith to contain information subject to protection under the Federal Rules of 18 Civil Procedure or Nevada law as “confidential” by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise set 19 forth herein. Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and 20 each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 21 2. A party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or 22 in response to written discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or on the record 23 at the deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. 24 3. A party may also designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after 25 receipt of discovery responses or of a deposition transcript that specific pages of the transcript 26 and/or specific responses be treated as “confidential” documentation or information. Any other 27 party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the Parties 28 shall follow the procedures described in paragraph VIII below. After any documentation or Jack D Campbell 1 information has been designated as confidential, the designated documentation or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures 2 described in paragraph VIII below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for marking all 3 previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the 4 specific confidential designation. The documents subject to the claim of confidentiality shall be 5 identified either by clearly describing the document or by referring to the document by its Bates- 6 stamp numbers, (e.g., COR-0000). 7 4. A party may designate as “confidential” documents or discovery 8 materials produced by a non-party by providing written notice to all Parties of the relevant 9 document numbers or other identification within thirty (30) days after receiving such documents 10 or other discovery materials. Any party may voluntarily disclose to others without restriction any 11 information designated by that party as confidential, although a document may lose its confidential 12 status if it is made public by the party designating the information as confidential. 13 B. Documents designated as set forth above shall hereafter be referred to as the 14 “confidential documentation.” The term “confidential documentation” shall include any 15 information (“confidential information”) obtained from the confidential documentation, and this 16 Stipulated Protective Order prohibits the use or disclosure of such confidential information to the 17 same extent as the confidential documentation. 18 III. General Prohibition: 19 Confidential documentation and information shall be used solely for the preparation, 20 prosecution and defense of the present case. Except as specified in Paragraph IV below, access to 21 confidential documentation and information shall be limited to the Court, its officers, court 22 reporters, counsel for the parties and counsel’s staff, the parties’ litigation representatives and 23 principals, their staff members assisting in the preparation, prosecution and defense of this case, 24 any authors or recipients of the confidential documentation, and witnesses. Except as specified 25 below, no person with access to confidential documentation or information shall reveal or discuss 26 such confidential documentation or information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive 27 such information, except as set forth herein. 28 Jack D Campbell 1 IV. Third Party Access: Counsel for any party may give access to the confidential documentation or information to independent experts and their staff, consulting firms, or other 2 independent contractors actually retained or employed to advise or assist such counsel and to 3 whom it is necessary that the confidential documentation and information be disclosed for 4 purposes of this case, provided that: 5 A. Before access to the confidential documentation and information are given 6 to any person pursuant Section IV, that person shall be informed by counsel proposing to give 7 access of, and shall agree to be bound by, the following provisions: 8 1. He or she shall not disclose the confidential documentation or 9 information to any person to whom this Stipulated Protective Order does not provide access. 10 2. He or she shall make no copies, compilations, or summaries of the 11 confidential documentation and information, except in connection with the preparation, 12 prosecution and defense of this case and if such copies, compilations or summaries are made, 13 neither those documents, nor the information contained therein shall be disclosed to any person 14 other than those permitted by this Stipulated Protective Order. 15 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McElroy v. City of Reno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelroy-v-city-of-reno-nvd-2024.