McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader

578 F. App'x 233
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2014·No. No. 13-2415·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

McElroy Coal Company and Consolidation Coal Company petition for review of [234] the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader, No. 12-0658-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader, 578 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2014).

578 F. App'x 233 (McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901