McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader
This text of 578 F. App'x 233 (McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
McElroy Coal Company and Consolidation Coal Company petition for review of [234]*234the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. McElroy Coal Co. v. Trader, No. 12-0658-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
578 F. App'x 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelroy-coal-co-v-trader-ca4-2014.