McElroy Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Fourth Circuit

McElroy Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

392 F. App'x 137

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 20, 2010

Docket09-1332, 09-1427

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 392 F. App'x 137 (McElroy Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McElroy Coal Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 392 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for review granted, order vacated, and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

McElroy Coal Company petitions this court to reverse the order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) adopting the administrative law judge’s decision that McElroy violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). McElroy argues that the two-member NLRB “group,” which issued its order on March 9, 2009, lacked the statutory authority to act because it had less than three members.

Shortly before oral argument in this case, we held in another case that the same two-member NLRB group constituted a quorum empowered to issue orders under the delegation provision of Section 3(b) of the Act. Narricot Industries, L.P. v. NLRB, 587 F.3d 654, 660 (4th Cir.2009). On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court abrogated our Narricot Industries decision when it issued its decision in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010), holding that Section 3(b) does not authorize two members to constitute a valid delegee group. Accordingly, the two-member NLRB group that issued the order in this case lacked the statutory authority to act. We therefore grant the petition for review, vacate the Board’s order, and remand to the Board for further proceedings.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED, ORDER VACATED, AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for review granted, order vacated, and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

McElroy Coal Company petitions this court to reverse the order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) adopting the administrative law judge’s decision that McElroy violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). McElroy argues that the two-member NLRB “group,” which issued its order on March 9, 2009, lacked the statutory authority to act because it had less than three members.

Shortly before oral argument in this case, we held in another case that the same two-member NLRB group constituted a quorum empowered to issue orders under the delegation provision of Section 3(b) of the Act. Narricot Industries, L.P. v. NLRB, 587 F.3d 654, 660 (4th Cir.2009). On June 17, 2010, the Supreme Court abrogated our Narricot Industries decision when it issued its decision in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2635, 177 L.Ed.2d 162 (2010), holding that Section 3(b) does not authorize two members to constitute a valid delegee group. Accordingly, the two-member NLRB group that issued the order in this case lacked the statutory authority to act. We therefore grant the petition for review, vacate the Board’s order, and remand to the Board for further proceedings.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED, ORDER VACATED, AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 F. App'x 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelroy-coal-co-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca4-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack