McElraevy & Hauck Co. v. Kronengold
134 A.D. 924, 118 N.Y.S. 1122
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1909
StatusPublished
This text of 134 A.D. 924 (McElraevy & Hauck Co. v. Kronengold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McElraevy & Hauck Co. v. Kronengold, 134 A.D. 924, 118 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
— Motion denied, without costs, on condition that the appeal he perfected within ten days and the case placed at the foot of the present calendar; otherwise motion to dismiss appeal granted, with costs. Present — Hirschberg, P. J., Jenks, Gaynor, Burr and Rich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 A.D. 924, 118 N.Y.S. 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelraevy-hauck-co-v-kronengold-nyappdiv-1909.