McElmurray v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McElmurray v. Marshall

141 S.E. 670, 37 Ga. App. 725, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 580

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 18, 1928

Docket18064

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 141 S.E. 670 (McElmurray v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McElmurray v. Marshall, 141 S.E. 670, 37 Ga. App. 725, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 580 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where the warrantee of a title to land has not yielded to a title paramount and is not in a situation requiring him to presently yield to such a title as a matter of legal duty, no breach of warranty is established. Clements v. Collins, 59 Ga. 124; White v. Stewart, 131 Ga. 460 (62 S. E. 590, 15 Ann. Cas. 1198); Burns v. Vereen, 132 Ga. 349 (64 S. E. 113); Joyner v. Smith, 132 Ga. 779 (65 S. E. 68).

2. In a suit for a breach of warranty of title to land, where the only allegation in the petition as to the existence of an outstanding title paramount and its effect upon the plaintiff’s possession of the land is that “there were heirs outstanding of former predecessors in said title who had a share, claim, and interest in said land and were asserting their right and ownership to the same,” it does not appear that the outstanding heirs had any valid title, or, if they had any title, that it had been established or had been asserted in such a manner as to force the plaintiff to yield possession of the land as a matter of legal duty.

3. The petition failed to set out a cause of action, and was properly dismissed on demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur. B. D. Feagin, for plaintiff. Duncan & Nunn, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. Where the warrantee of a title to land has not yielded to a title paramount and is not in a situation requiring him to presently yield to such a title as a matter of legal duty, no breach of warranty is established. Clements v. Collins, 59 Ga. 124; White v. Stewart, 131 Ga. 460 (62 S. E. 590, 15 Ann. Cas. 1198); Burns v. Vereen, 132 Ga. 349 (64 S. E. 113); Joyner v. Smith, 132 Ga. 779 (65 S. E. 68).

2. In a suit for a breach of warranty of title to land, where the only allegation in the petition as to the existence of an outstanding title paramount and its effect upon the plaintiff’s possession of the land is that “there were heirs outstanding of former predecessors in said title who had a share, claim, and interest in said land and were asserting their right and ownership to the same,” it does not appear that the outstanding heirs had any valid title, or, if they had any title, that it had been established or had been asserted in such a manner as to force the plaintiff to yield possession of the land as a matter of legal duty.

3. The petition failed to set out a cause of action, and was properly dismissed on demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur. B. D. Feagin, for plaintiff. Duncan & Nunn, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 S.E. 670, 37 Ga. App. 725, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelmurray-v-marshall-gactapp-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack