McEllison v. State

1945 OK CR 109, 162 P.2d 785, 81 Okla. Crim. 235, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 240
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 17, 1945
DocketNo. A-10484.
StatusPublished

This text of 1945 OK CR 109 (McEllison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McEllison v. State, 1945 OK CR 109, 162 P.2d 785, 81 Okla. Crim. 235, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 240 (Okla. Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

BAREFOOT, P. J.

Defendant, Westley McEllison, was charged, by amended information, in the county court of Garfield county, with the crime of “unlawfully making an offer to one Sergeant Thompson to secure another, to wit: * * *, for the purpose of prostitution with said Sergeant Thompson”; was tried, convicted and sentenced by the court to serve a term of four months in the county jail, and to pay $41.60 costs, and has appealed.

This is a companion case to that of Dunham v. State, reported in 81 Okla. Cr. 205, 162 P. 2d 332.

*236 The facts herein are identical with the facts in the above mentioned case, and for the reasons stated therein, the case must be reversed.

It also appears in this case that the trial court failed to charge the jury with reference to the punishment which could be assessed under the statute. The only charge of the court with reference to the punishment to be assessed was as follows:

“You are further instructed that if you find the defendant guilty, but are unable to agree upon the sentence to be imposed you may return a verdict of guilty and the court will assess and declare the sentence to be imposed upon your finding of guilty.”

This statute, under which defendant was prosecuted, provided for a punishment of “not less than thirty (30) days nor more than one (1) year * * * in the county jail.” 21 O. S. Supp. 1943 § 1031. The jury should have been instructed as to this penalty and given an opportunity to fix the punishment, and in the event they could not agree on the punishment, it could then be left to the court to assess the same.

For the reasons above stated, the judgment of the county court of Garfield county is reversed.

JONES, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunham v. State
1945 OK CR 97 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1945 OK CR 109, 162 P.2d 785, 81 Okla. Crim. 235, 1945 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcellison-v-state-oklacrimapp-1945.