McElligott v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority
This text of 197 A.D.2d 911 (McElligott v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants failed to meet their burden of showing that plaintiffs cause of action has no merit (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales, 66 NY2d 965, 967). (Appeal from Order of Supreme [912]*912Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.D.2d 911, 604 N.Y.S.2d 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelligott-v-rochester-genesee-regional-transportation-authority-nyappdiv-1993.