McElligott v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority
197 A.D.2d 911, 604 N.Y.S.2d 841
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants failed to meet their burden of showing that plaintiffs cause of action has no merit (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; GTF Mktg. v Colonial Aluminum Sales, 66 NY2d 965, 967). (Appeal from Order of Supreme [912]*912Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McElligott v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority, 197 A.D.2d 911, 604 N.Y.S.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
197 A.D.2d 911 (McElligott v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.
489 N.E.2d 755 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)