McElhinney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McElhinney v. State

1930 OK CR 273, 292 P. 81, 48 Okla. Crim. 373, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 152

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1930

DocketNo. A-7530.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 273 (McElhinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McElhinney v. State, 1930 OK CR 273, 292 P. 81, 48 Okla. Crim. 373, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 152 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of selling whisky, and sentenced to- pay a fine of f 50 and costs and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days, from which judgment and sentence the plaintiff in error has appealed to this court. The appeal in this case was filed in this court August 30, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Where no briefs are filed and no appearance made, the court will presume that the appeal has been abandoned or is without merit. A careful examination of the record disclosesi that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

No fundamental or prejudicial errors appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of selling whisky, and sentenced to- pay a fine of f 50 and costs and be confined in the county jail for a period of 30 days, from which judgment and sentence the plaintiff in error has appealed to this court. The appeal in this case was filed in this court August 30, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance made for oral argument.

Where no briefs are filed and no appearance made, the court will presume that the appeal has been abandoned or is without merit. A careful examination of the record disclosesi that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict of the jury.

No fundamental or prejudicial errors appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 273, 292 P. 81, 48 Okla. Crim. 373, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcelhinney-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.