McEachern v. Boston & Maine Railroad

23 N.E. 231, 150 Mass. 515, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 320
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 1890
StatusPublished
Cited by21 cases

This text of 23 N.E. 231 (McEachern v. Boston & Maine Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McEachern v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 23 N.E. 231, 150 Mass. 515, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 320 (Mass. 1890).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

The declaration shows that the plaintiff, a boy upwards of eleven years of age, was a trespasser upon the land of the defendant, committing an unlawful act in meddling with the defendant’s car. He was not invited or enticed there by the defendant, and the defendant owed him no duty to have the car safe for him to visit. Lane v. Atlantic Works, 111 Mass. 136. Johnson v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 125 Mass. 75. Morrissey v. Eastern Railroad, 126 Mass. 377.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Falardeau v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.
175 N.E. 471 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1931)
Christiansen v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co.
291 P. 926 (Utah Supreme Court, 1930)
Branan v. Wimsatt
298 F. 833 (D.C. Circuit, 1924)
Buddy v. Union Terminal Railway Co.
207 S.W. 821 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1918)
Papich v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
183 Iowa 601 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1918)
Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Co. v. Sain
119 S.W. 659 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
O'Leary v. Michigan State Telephone Co.
109 N.W. 434 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1906)
York v. Pacific & Northern Railway Co.
69 P. 1042 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1902)
Ryan v. Towar
55 L.R.A. 310 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)
Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. Beavers
39 S.E. 82 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Turess v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad
40 A. 614 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1898)
Kane v. West End Street Railway Co.
47 N.E. 501 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Holbrook v. Aldrich
36 L.R.A. 493 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Richards v. Connell
63 N.W. 915 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Grindley v. McKechnie
40 N.E. 764 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Barney v. Hannibal & St. Joseph Railroad
28 S.W. 1069 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Chenery v. Fitchburg Railroad
22 L.R.A. 575 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
McGuiness v. Butler
34 N.E. 259 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Gay v. Essex Electric Street Railway Co.
34 N.E. 186 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Daniels v. New York & New England Railroad
13 L.R.A. 248 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.E. 231, 150 Mass. 515, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mceachern-v-boston-maine-railroad-mass-1890.