McDuffie v. State

28 So. 3d 102, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20511, 2009 WL 5151747
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2009·No. 1D08-2104·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Appellant, Tavares Antonio McDuffie, challenges his conviction entered after jury trial on an amended information. He argues on appeal that the filing of the amended information during the speedy trial rule’s recapture period precluded his trial on that amended information. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.191(p).

Because the propriety and timeliness of the amended information was not raised in the trial proceedings, it has not been preserved for appeal. State v. Olivo, 759 So.2d 647 (Fla.2000).

Appellant’s challenges to evidence admitted over defense counsel’s objections are unsupported by any showing in the record that the trial court abused its discretion.

The judgment on appeal is AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDuffie v. State, 28 So. 3d 102, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20511, 2009 WL 5151747 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

28 So. 3d 102 (McDuffie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDuffie v. State
135 So. 3d 317 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)