McDuffie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDuffie v. State

312 So. 2d 467, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14946

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDuffie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 341 So. 2d 840 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 16, 1975·No. No. W-56·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction after a jury trial on charges of robbery for which he was sentenced to twenty years.

We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the trial court, both with re[468]*468spect to the speedy trial rule and the introduction into evidence of the deposition of the victim. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction after a jury trial on charges of robbery for which he was sentenced to twenty years.

We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the trial court, both with re[468]*468spect to the speedy trial rule and the introduction into evidence of the deposition of the victim. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.

McDuffie v. State, 312 So. 2d 467, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14946 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

312 So. 2d 467 (McDuffie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.