McDowell v. United States

Tenth Circuit

McDowell v. United States

313 F.2d 638

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 1963

DocketNos. 7164, 7180

StatusPublished

This text of 313 F.2d 638 (McDowell v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDowell v. United States, 313 F.2d 638 (10th Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In case No. 7164, judgment affirmed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, for the reason stated in the order of the United States District Court. In case No. 7180, appeal dismissed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, since the record conclusively shows that appellant is not now serving the sentence he attacks and relief under section 2255 is not available to him. Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407; Igo v. United States, 10 Cir., 303 F.2d 317.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In case No. 7164, judgment affirmed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, for the reason stated in the order of the United States District Court. In case No. 7180, appeal dismissed February 5, 1963, without written opinion, since the record conclusively shows that appellant is not now serving the sentence he attacks and relief under section 2255 is not available to him. Heflin v. United States, 358 U.S. 415, 79 S.Ct. 451, 3 L.Ed.2d 407; Igo v. United States, 10 Cir., 303 F.2d 317.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

313 F.2d 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdowell-v-united-states-ca10-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack