McDowell v. State

70 S.W.2d 708, 126 Tex. Crim. 262, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 631
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 18, 1934
DocketNo. 16671.
StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.W.2d 708 (McDowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDowell v. State, 70 S.W.2d 708, 126 Tex. Crim. 262, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 631 (Tex. 1934).

Opinions

KRUEGER, Judge. —

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of theft, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.

The record is before us without any statement of facts, and *263 only one bill of exception, in which the appellant complains of error in the admission of testimony, but, in the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to properly appraise the bill.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pilgrim v. State
219 S.W. 451 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.W.2d 708, 126 Tex. Crim. 262, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdowell-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.