McDowell v. State

117 S.E.2d 886, 102 Ga. App. 761, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 743
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 30, 1960·No. 38573·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carlisle, Judge.

An approved brief of the evidence is essential to a valid motion for a new trial, and where, as in this case, the record shows that the trial judge overruled the motion for a new trial on the general grounds on August 4, 1960, and that no valid brief of the evidence was approved by him until August 31, 1960, the judgment overruling the motion was proper and must be .affirmed. Since the trial judge did not have before him, at the time he entered the judgment, the brief of the evidence, the only legal judgment he could have rendered in the case was one of dismissal of the motion, but his judgment overruling it reaches the same result and, therefore, that judgment will not be disturbed. See Rich v. State, 74 Ga. 811; Gulick v. Mulcahy, 95 Ga. App. 158 (97 S. E. 2d 362); Scales v. Neal, 96 Ga. App. 168 (99 S. E. 2d 498). Cf. General Finance &c. Corp. v. Davis, 97 Ga. App. 391 (103 S. E. 2d 149).

Judgment affirmed.

Townsend, P. J., Frankum and Jordan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDowell v. State, 117 S.E.2d 886, 102 Ga. App. 761, 1960 Ga. App. LEXIS 743 (Ga. Ct. App. 1960).

117 S.E.2d 886 (McDowell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. State
393 S.E.2d 709 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)