Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McDowell v. State

McDowell v. State

861 So. 2d 107, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19240, 2003 WL 22964279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDowell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 903 So. 2d 290 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 2003·No. No. 1D02-3124·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, but, as in Walker v. State, 853 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

IS THE FLORIDA STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTION ON “POSSESSION OF PROPERTY RECENTLY STOLEN” AN IMPERMISSIBLE COMMENT ON THE EVIDENCE?

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDowell v. State, 861 So. 2d 107, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19240, 2003 WL 22964279 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

861 So. 2d 107 (McDowell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
853 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)