McDowell v. State

861 So. 2d 107, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19240, 2003 WL 22964279
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 18, 2003
DocketNo. 1D02-3124
StatusPublished

This text of 861 So. 2d 107 (McDowell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDowell v. State, 861 So. 2d 107, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19240, 2003 WL 22964279 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, but, as in Walker v. State, 853 So.2d 498 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), certify the following question to be one of great public importance:

IS THE FLORIDA STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTION ON “POSSESSION OF PROPERTY RECENTLY STOLEN” AN IMPERMISSIBLE COMMENT ON THE EVIDENCE?

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. State
853 So. 2d 498 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
861 So. 2d 107, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19240, 2003 WL 22964279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdowell-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.