McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton
Opinion
James Stephon McDowell appeals the district court’s order accepting the. recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the [137] record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton, No. 9:14-cv-02132-BHH, 2015 WL 4429630 (D.S.C. July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
631 F. App'x 136 (McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.