McDowell v. McDowell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McDowell v. McDowell

272 A.D.2d 1004

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1004 (McDowell v. McDowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDowell v. McDowell, 272 A.D.2d 1004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

I Order entered October 24, 1946, unanimously modified by striking out the pro-" [1005]*1005vision for counsel fee, by reducing the alimony to $200 a month and by directing that the unpaid arrears of alimony be paid at the rate of $25 a month in addition. The issue with respect to the amount of the unpaid alimony is referred to an official referee to report to the court at Special Term. Appeal from order entered November 26, 1946, denying defendant’s motion to resettle the order entered October 24, 1946, unanimously dismissed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

I Order entered October 24, 1946, unanimously modified by striking out the pro-" [1005]*1005vision for counsel fee, by reducing the alimony to $200 a month and by directing that the unpaid arrears of alimony be paid at the rate of $25 a month in addition. The issue with respect to the amount of the unpaid alimony is referred to an official referee to report to the court at Special Term. Appeal from order entered November 26, 1946, denying defendant’s motion to resettle the order entered October 24, 1946, unanimously dismissed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdowell-v-mcdowell-nyappdiv-1947.