McDowell v. Justice

167 N.C. 493
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 23, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

AilBN, J.

The summons is irregular, in that it was made returnable to a term of court convening within less than ten days from the date of its issue (Scott v. Jarrell, ante, 364), but the defendant cannot avail himself of this objection, because he appeared in the action and moved for a restraining order. Scott v. Life Assn., 137 N. C., 517; Grant v. Grant, 159 N. C., 531.

The facts found by his Honor are not as favorable to- the defendant as those in Pierce v. Eller, at this term, in which a motion to set aside a judgment was denied, and that case is decisive of this.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDowell v. Justice, 167 N.C. 493 (N.C. 1914).

167 N.C. 493 (McDowell v. Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buncombe County v. . Penland
173 S.E. 609 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
County of Buncombe v. Penland
206 N.C. 299 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)