McDowell v. Heiner
15 F.2d 1015, 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 6451, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3104, 6 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 6451
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 1926
Docket3511
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 15 F.2d 1015 (McDowell v. Heiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McDowell v. Heiner, 15 F.2d 1015, 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 6451, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3104, 6 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 6451 (3d Cir. 1926).
Opinion
The opinion of the court below, reported at 9 F.(2d) 120, is so full and satisfactory that a further one by this court cannot perforce be but an attempt to restate what that court satisfactorily said. We therefore restrict ourselves to adopting its opinion and affirming its decree, dismissing plaintiff’s biR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frank Irey, Jr., Inc., a Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
519 F.2d 1200 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 F.2d 1015, 6 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 6451, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3104, 6 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 6451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdowell-v-heiner-ca3-1926.