McDougall v. State

22 S.W. 593, 32 Tex. Crim. 174, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 243
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 20, 1893
DocketNo. 40.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 S.W. 593 (McDougall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDougall v. State, 22 S.W. 593, 32 Tex. Crim. 174, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 243 (Tex. 1893).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant having been convicted in the Justice Court, sought to prosecute his appeal to the District Court. Upon motion of the county attorney, the appeal was dismissed in the latter court, because the transcript did not show that notice of appeal was given in the former court, and entered upon its docket. In support of his motion for new trial in the District Court, the defendant offered to prove that he in fact did give the required notice, but it was not entered upon the docket. The evidence was rejected. The ruling was correct. The no *175 tice of appeal must be given, and the justice shall enter such notice upon his docket.” Code Crim. Proc., art. 939; Ball v. The State, 31 Texas Cr. Rep., 214. Defendants desiring to prosecute appeal from the Justice to the County or District Court must comply with the terms of the law in such cases made and provided, in order to perfect their appeals. They should see that the notice is properly entered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
164 S.W. 833 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Truss v. State
43 S.W. 92 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.W. 593, 32 Tex. Crim. 174, 1893 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdougall-v-state-texcrimapp-1893.