McDougall v. Miln

New York Court of Chancery

McDougall v. Miln

2 Paige Ch. 325, 1831 N.Y. LEXIS 251, 1831 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 41

DecidedMarch 1, 1831

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Paige Ch. 325 (McDougall v. Miln) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDougall v. Miln, 2 Paige Ch. 325, 1831 N.Y. LEXIS 251, 1831 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 41 (N.Y. 1831).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

The decision of the vice chancellor in this case is beyond all doubt correct. This is not a bill of , discovery, but a bill for relief; as it contains a general prayer to that effect. The proper course therefore for the defendant is to obtain orders to produce witnesses and to close the proofs, and to bring the cause to a hearing in the usual manner. If it then turns out that the complainant is not entitled to any decree against the defendant, and that his bill was improperly filed as a bill for relief, he will of course be decreed to pay the whole costs of the litigation. Whether it is possible for the complainant to make out by evidence a case which will entitle him to any relief upon this bill is a question not necessary now to determine. (See 8 Price, 522.)

[326]*326The order of the vice chancellor must be affirmed with costs; and the case must be remitted back to him that such further proceedings may be had in the cause as may be necessary.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

The decision of the vice chancellor in this case is beyond all doubt correct. This is not a bill of , discovery, but a bill for relief; as it contains a general prayer to that effect. The proper course therefore for the defendant is to obtain orders to produce witnesses and to close the proofs, and to bring the cause to a hearing in the usual manner. If it then turns out that the complainant is not entitled to any decree against the defendant, and that his bill was improperly filed as a bill for relief, he will of course be decreed to pay the whole costs of the litigation. Whether it is possible for the complainant to make out by evidence a case which will entitle him to any relief upon this bill is a question not necessary now to determine. (See 8 Price, 522.)

[326]*326The order of the vice chancellor must be affirmed with costs; and the case must be remitted back to him that such further proceedings may be had in the cause as may be necessary.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Paige Ch. 325, 1831 N.Y. LEXIS 251, 1831 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdougall-v-miln-nychanct-1831.