McDougald v. State
614 So. 2d 1115, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11795
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 1992
DocketNos. 91-3469, 92-0772
StatusPublished
This text of 614 So. 2d 1115 (McDougald v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McDougald v. State, 614 So. 2d 1115, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
This cause is affirmed in all respects with the exception that we remand in order for the trial judge to conform the written sentence with his oral pronouncement. See Williamson v. State, 569 So.2d 1368 (Pla. 4th DCA 1990). However, we affirm the inclusion of costs as a special condition of probation.
AFFIRM IN PART; REMAND IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Williamson v. State
569 So. 2d 1368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 1115, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdougald-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.