Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McDougald v. State

McDougald v. State

614 So. 2d 1115, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11795
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1992·No. Nos. 91-3469, 92-0772·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is affirmed in all respects with the exception that we remand in order for the trial judge to conform the written sentence with his oral pronouncement. See Williamson v. State, 569 So.2d 1368 (Pla. 4th DCA 1990). However, we affirm the inclusion of costs as a special condition of probation.

AFFIRM IN PART; REMAND IN PART.

LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDougald v. State, 614 So. 2d 1115, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11795 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

614 So. 2d 1115 (McDougald v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williamson v. State
569 So. 2d 1368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)