McDougal v. Roman

California Supreme Court

McDougal v. Roman

2 Cal. 80

California Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The law of January 26th, 1852, did not take effect until the 27th, the date on which it received the approval [81]*81of the Governor; and does not, in its operation, affect any money in the hands of the Treasurer before the 27th. Such money must be paid according to the provisions of law. So much of the judgment of the Court below as gives costs against the Treasurer, must be reversed. The judgment for a peremptory mandamus is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The law of January 26th, 1852, did not take effect until the 27th, the date on which it received the approval [81]*81of the Governor; and does not, in its operation, affect any money in the hands of the Treasurer before the 27th. Such money must be paid according to the provisions of law. So much of the judgment of the Court below as gives costs against the Treasurer, must be reversed. The judgment for a peremptory mandamus is affirmed, with costs.

McDougal v. Roman, 2 Cal. 80 (Cal. 1852).

Pincite

2 Cal. 80 (McDougal v. Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related