McDougal v. Roman

California Supreme Court

McDougal v. Roman

2 Cal. 80

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1852

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Cal. 80 (McDougal v. Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDougal v. Roman, 2 Cal. 80 (Cal. 1852).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The law of January 26th, 1852, did not take effect until the 27th, the date on which it received the approval [81]*81of the Governor; and does not, in its operation, affect any money in the hands of the Treasurer before the 27th. Such money must be paid according to the provisions of law. So much of the judgment of the Court below as gives costs against the Treasurer, must be reversed. The judgment for a peremptory mandamus is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The law of January 26th, 1852, did not take effect until the 27th, the date on which it received the approval [81]*81of the Governor; and does not, in its operation, affect any money in the hands of the Treasurer before the 27th. Such money must be paid according to the provisions of law. So much of the judgment of the Court below as gives costs against the Treasurer, must be reversed. The judgment for a peremptory mandamus is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cal. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdougal-v-roman-cal-1852.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack