McDougal v. Peoples Savings Bank

Mississippi Supreme Court

McDougal v. Peoples Savings Bank

2 Miss. Dec. 323

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McDougal v. Peoples Savings Bank. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 Miss. 663 →

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 23, 1883·Published

Opinion

Opinion.

Per curiam:

The bill shows a case entitling the complainant to relief. the answers, in so far as they avoid the allegations of the bill, are not responsive to the bill, and are not supported by evidence. the court erred in rendering the decree, as given, against the complainant. Proof was required.

We will not render a decree here, but reverse tbe decree, and remand tbe cause for evidence to be taken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion.

Per curiam:

The bill shows a case entitling the complainant to relief. the answers, in so far as they avoid the allegations of the bill, are not responsive to the bill, and are not supported by evidence. the court erred in rendering the decree, as given, against the complainant. Proof was required.

We will not render a decree here, but reverse tbe decree, and remand tbe cause for evidence to be taken.

McDougal v. Peoples Savings Bank, 2 Miss. Dec. 323 (Mich. 1883).

Pincite

2 Miss. Dec. 323 (McDougal v. Peoples Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.