McDonough v. United States

202 F.2d 424, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3248
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 11, 1953
Docket11676
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 F.2d 424 (McDonough v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonough v. United States, 202 F.2d 424, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3248 (6th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The. above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the district court found that the property in question, which was seized by the agents of the United States, was not contraband, and that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.A. § 2465, it should be returned forthwith to the respective owners; and it further appearing that the district court ordered the United States Marshal to return forthwith the said property to the respective owners by releasing it at its present location, which *425 is approximately 100 miles from the places where it was seized, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the district court be amended to provide that the United States Marshal return the property in question to the respective owners at the places where it was seized; and that the cause be remanded to the district court for entry of such amended judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 F.2d 424, 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 3248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonough-v-united-states-ca6-1953.