McDonnell v. Collins

Montana Supreme Court

McDonnell v. Collins

48 P. 549, 19 Mont. 372, 1897 Mont. LEXIS 46

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 1897

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 48 P. 549 (McDonnell v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDonnell v. Collins, 48 P. 549, 19 Mont. 372, 1897 Mont. LEXIS 46 (Mo. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Pemberton, C. J.

We think this is an action of that character which section 613, Code of Civil Procedure, requires to be brought in the county where the defendants, or some of them, reside at the commencement of the action, or where the plaintiff resides, and the defendants, or any of them, may be found. It is not disputed that both defendants resided in Cascade county at the time this action was commenced, and that they were both served with summons in this suit in Cascade county; nor is it claimed that either of them was found in Fergus county. We think, under the showing made by the defendants, that the court erred in refusing to change the venue of the case to Cascade county. (Wallace v. Owsley, 11 Mont. 219, 27 Pac. 790; Paige v. Carroll, 61 Cal. 215; Cook v. Pendergast, Id. 72; Watkins v. Degener, 63 Cal. 500; Yore v. Murphy, 10 Mont. 304, 25 Pac. 1039.) The order appealed from is reversed and the case remanded, with instructions to the district court to grant the change of venue.

Reversed and Remanded.

Hunt and Buck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pemberton, C. J.

We think this is an action of that character which section 613, Code of Civil Procedure, requires to be brought in the county where the defendants, or some of them, reside at the commencement of the action, or where the plaintiff resides, and the defendants, or any of them, may be found. It is not disputed that both defendants resided in Cascade county at the time this action was commenced, and that they were both served with summons in this suit in Cascade county; nor is it claimed that either of them was found in Fergus county. We think, under the showing made by the defendants, that the court erred in refusing to change the venue of the case to Cascade county. (Wallace v. Owsley, 11 Mont. 219, 27 Pac. 790; Paige v. Carroll, 61 Cal. 215; Cook v. Pendergast, Id. 72; Watkins v. Degener, 63 Cal. 500; Yore v. Murphy, 10 Mont. 304, 25 Pac. 1039.) The order appealed from is reversed and the case remanded, with instructions to the district court to grant the change of venue.

Reversed and Remanded.

Hunt and Buck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 P. 549, 19 Mont. 372, 1897 Mont. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonnell-v-collins-mont-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack