McDonnell v. Cohen
This text of 252 A.D. 277 (McDonnell v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The board of elections -were within then rights when they reconsidered their original determination and rejected the petition. This ruling cast on the appellants the burden of establishing that the petition contained the required number of valid signatures. It was conceded upon the argument that this was not established by the record before us. The record does contain affirmative proof tending to support the ruling of the board.
The orders should be affirmed.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
In McDonnell proceeding: Order unanimously affirmed.
In Nagler proceeding: Order unanimously affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 277, 299 N.Y.S. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonnell-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1937.